Remote patient monitoring

VivaLNK recently surveyed healthcare professionals, affirming that remote patient monitoring (RPM) is set to expand rapidly, largely due to COVID-19.

 

ICONS: ADOBE STOCK
SOURCE: VIVALNK

How important is 24-hour continuous vs. episodic data capture?

53% - Very important

38% - Somewhat important

7% - Not important 2% - Episodic data is enough

What is driving RPM adoption? (choose all that apply)

72% - Patients’ reluctance to visit doctors/hospitals

34% - Need new revenue streams

27% – Expansion outside geographical area

1% - Other

What applications will use RPM? (choose all that apply)

55% - COVID-19 monitoring

50% - Chronic conditions monitoring

41% - Preventing rehospitalization

39% - Acute conditions monitoring

38% - Cardiac monitoring

12% - Chemotherapy monitoring

9% - Other

What stage level is your RPM adoption?

21% - Already used/adopted

16% - Plans to adopt within 6 months

8% - Plans to adopt within 6 to 12 months

22% - Considering; no plans yet

34% - No plans to adopt

Where will RPM adoption be in 5 years?

43% - On-par with in-patient monitoring

35% - Surpass in-patient monitoring

18% - Less than in-patient monitoring

3% - Other

1% - Usage limited

For more info click here.

Source: VivaLNK

June 2021
Explore the June 2021 Issue

Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.