
ICONS: ADOBE STOCK
SOURCE: VIVALNK
How important is 24-hour continuous vs. episodic data capture?
53% - Very important
38% - Somewhat important
7% - Not important 2% - Episodic data is enoughWhat is driving RPM adoption? (choose all that apply)
72% - Patients’ reluctance to visit doctors/hospitals
34% - Need new revenue streams
27% – Expansion outside geographical area
1% - Other
What applications will use RPM? (choose all that apply)
55% - COVID-19 monitoring
50% - Chronic conditions monitoring
41% - Preventing rehospitalization
39% - Acute conditions monitoring
38% - Cardiac monitoring
12% - Chemotherapy monitoring
9% - Other
What stage level is your RPM adoption?
21% - Already used/adopted
16% - Plans to adopt within 6 months
8% - Plans to adopt within 6 to 12 months
22% - Considering; no plans yet
34% - No plans to adopt
Where will RPM adoption be in 5 years?
43% - On-par with in-patient monitoring
35% - Surpass in-patient monitoring
18% - Less than in-patient monitoring
3% - Other
1% - Usage limited
Source: VivaLNK

Explore the June 2021 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Today's Medical Developments
- You can still register for March’s Manufacturing Lunch + Learn!
- HERMES AWARD 2025 – Jury nominates three tech innovations
- Vision Engineering’s EVO Cam HALO
- How to Reduce First Article Inspection Creation Time by 70% to 90% with DISCUS Software
- FANUC America launches new robot tutorial website for all
- Murata Machinery USA’s MT1065EX twin-spindle, CNC turning center
- #40 - Lunch & Learn with Fagor Automation
- Kistler offers service for piezoelectric force sensors and measuring chains