Direct measurement has become the gold standard for precise cavity pressure measurement in injection molding, where the tiniest deviation from the standard can lead to subpar product quality and even unsafe products. Highly regulated industries such as medtech benefit from monitoring product quality to sort out faulty parts automatically and eventually optimize processes. However, direct cavity pressure sensors come into immediate contact with the melt in the cavity, which in special cases can have a negative impact on the longevity of the sensors or even damage them. Measurement specialist Kistler has put a new solution on the market which avoids this problem: contact-free measurement. Piezoelectric sensors measure the strain the injected melt puts on the mold’s walls instead of the pressure in the cavity, avoiding contact with the melt. This technology generates precise and reproducible values and is especially suitable for the manufacturing of grade A surfaces, medical parts such as lenses, or materials with a low viscosity such as liquid silicone.
Using advanced cavity pressure sensors and matching software allows injection molders to measure cavity pressure during the entire production process. By taking an ideal product, they can use the measuring curve from its production as a quality benchmark against which all future processes are measured. In addition, injection molders can optimize production processes based on the deviations from the targeted measuring curve. When direct measurement is involved, sensors and cables are installed directly into the mold’s wall (see figure 1). The sensor’s tip is level with the wall, so the injected plastic melt comes into direct contact with the sensor. The sensor can then measure absolute cavity pressure values and compare them to the ideal curve. While this technology is yet unmatched in terms of accuracy, it does come with some disadvantages. For example, the sensor leaves a small mark on every manufactured plastic part and while it’s minimal, especially when using miniature sensors, this can still be an issue for high-precision products such as lenses. Also, the direct contact of the sensor with the plastic melt makes it susceptible to pollution. As a result, the status of the sensor needs to be closely monitored and may require frequent maintenance and replacement, especially with the use of certain materials.
Aside from direct measurement, some companies also use indirect sensors to measure cavity pressure. Unlike direct sensors, they can be retrofitted to the mold, as they are positioned behind the ejector pins (see figure 2). However, this also makes them vulnerable to errors, for instance if the mounting hole isn’t a perfect fit for the ejector pin. They can also be impacted by the gases emitted by the plastic melt. Melts with low viscosity such as liquid silicone can even flow into the ejector pin hole.
Contactless cavity pressure measurement
With these methods in mind, Kistler started to work on a measuring alternative that would provide precise and reproducible measurement but avoid disadvantages such as a negative impact on the sensors. The development team came across a procedure which completely avoids melt contact with the sensors as it measures the strain the melt pressure puts on the mold’s metal walls. Although this contact-free measurement method doesn’t measure absolute cavity pressure values, it allows injection molders to draw accurate conclusions about them. Measuring the strain results in a very similar measuring curve to other measurement methods and leads to reproducible curves, meeting an essential requirement of quality assurance and regulatory guidelines.
The major advantage of contact-free measurement as opposed to direct measurement technology lies in its positioning: since the sensors don’t have to be in direct contact with the plastic melt, they can be placed 2mm to 4mm behind the cavity wall (see figure 3). They consequently leave no imprint on the manufactured product, making the technology first choice for production of grade A surfaces or high-precision products where even the smallest imprint can impact the product’s quality. Positioned behind the wall, the sensors are protected from the plastic melt and additional influences such as gases or outside dirt, reducing maintenance. The sensors can be removed easily for service purposes and are easy to install with more potential spots available in the mold – they can be positioned independently of the demolding direction and don’t need space close to the cavity. They only require one mounting hole where the sensor is placed and set with a predefined preload.
Perfect sensor placement with FEA
Kistler supports customers in finding the perfect spot by providing a finite element analysis (FEA). This helps customers find a suitable spot for sensors and evaluate at which maximum distance to the mold wall the sensor can be placed while still providing accurate measurements. For the FEA, customers send in a 3D CAD model showing where they want to place the sensor. The Kistler team calculates what the actual sensitivity of the sensor in that position will be via FEA (see figure 4), factoring in both the strain on the metal and side forces. Their report then shows if the chosen position will allow the sensor to accurately measure the cavity pressure or suggests alternative placements, if that’s not the case.
Miniature sensors for medical applications
Kistler sensors have already been used to measure strain in other applications, such as machining, to measure dynamic or quasistatic forces on fixed or moving machine parts. When developing the first strain sensor for injection molding, Type 9247A, Kistler leveraged its experiences with these applications and knowledge of measuring cavity pressure. With a circumference of 4.4mm, the 9247A is suitable for manufacturing larger plastic parts and has been in use with plastic manufacturers in the cosmetic and automotive industry since 2010. Focusing on medical applications, Kistler then looked at developing an even smaller sensor suitable for the compact molds used for products such as lenses, syringes, and EpiPens.
As a result, Kistler launched a piezoelectric miniature longitudinal measuring pin in 2018 and an updated version, the 9239B miniature longitudinal pin, in 2022. With a circumference of only 2.5mm, it can be used in small molds or ones that have limited space. One significant difference between the two sensor versions is the crystal: while the previous version of the sensor used a quartz crystal, the new version features a PiezoStar crystal specifically grown by Kistler. This update raises the sensor’s sensitivity from 5.9 picocoulombs per Newton (pC/N) to 28.5 pC/N, allowing the sensor to measure weaker signals reliably and precisely.
The road ahead
Contact-free measurement using longitudinal piezoelectric sensors offers three main advantages – not leaving a mark in the surfaces of manufactured products, precise measurement, and low maintenance. This is great news for the medtech industry, where manufacturing companies need highly reliable cavity measurement and process monitoring systems to produce high-quality products and comply with regulatory requirements such as the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) in the U.S. and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in Europe. Within complex medical device production, both direct and contact-free measurement can fulfill different demands. For instance, manufacturers can use contact-free measurement for high-precision products and instances where molding a perfect surface is essential, while still relying on direct measurement technology where small marks left on the product don’t impact its quality.
Kistlerhttps://www.kistler.com
Explore the April 2024 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Today's Medical Developments
- Best of 2024: #8 Article – Perfecting the CMP process for surgical blades
- Best of 2024: #8 News – Johnson & Johnson to acquire Shockwave Medical
- Best of 2024: #9 Article – Strategy Milling combines old and new for precision dental restorations
- Best of 2024: #9 News – Global robotics race
- Best of 2024: #10 Article – Designing medical devices for every user
- Best of 2024: #10 News – 4 predictions for 2024: AI set to supercharge robotic automation
- Children’s National, FDA collaborate to advance pediatric device regulatory tools
- LK Metrology’s eco-friendliness CMMs